I was pretty annoyed recently when I read of a statement by the Minister of Health that alcoholics should be denied treatment by the public health sector. That sanctimonious ... um... person...!!! Who is he to decide who gets treated and who gets denied? And then my second thoughts kicked in. I have been guilty of thinking the very same thing, not once but a hundred times, not just about alcoholics, but also of smokers and several others too.
It's hard to think charitable thoughts when an alcoholic is wheeled in as a "stat" admission, usually semi-conscious, vomiting blood, delirious and uncooperative. I confess I usually suppress a groan of despair at the sight of them... and with good reason. Almost invariably it results in a lot of running around, organising blood, plasma etc. etc. Especially at night where there is only one doctor and two nurses in a ward, this usually means that other patients might get neglected. Drugs and injections are not given on time, and other admissions are not seen to, because everyone is hovering around the alcoholic dude.
You see, the chronic alcoholics are LOUD. They are dramatic - swollen bellies, hallucinations, screams, blood and guts. They are critical - they may go into cardiac arrest at any time. And when (not if) they do, they are so obese, that it is near impossible for me to clamber on to their beds to deliver effective CPR. An additional thing I've noticed is that somehow, the relatives are the most demanding I've come across, the ones who are quick to make a fuss if things aren't done NOW.
And in the melee it is easy to miss the young dengue patient whose blood pressure has dropped, or the guy with the heart attack who has developed a rhythm disturbance of the heart, or the guy with leptospirosis whose urine output has dropped. When we do find out, it's because they too have progressed to a critical stage, when it could have been nipped in the bud. And that's not fair.
Then there is the expense. It's ironic that the patients with chronic lung disease due to smoking and chronic liver disease due to boozing cost the state more that the innocent johnny on the next bed who has done nothing to deserve his illness. Spiral CT scans, high resolution CT scans, ultra-sound scans, endoscopy, radiographically guided biopsies, inhalers, drugs, blood and blood products. Factor in the cost of hospital stay, meals, linen etc., which are also borne by the state. And then the health care sector runs through its allocated budget, and it is the other poor patients that bear the brunt of it. That's not fair.
You have to admit that the diseases are distressing, painful and associated with the hopelessness of knowing there is no cure. Yet because of the whole psychology behind short term rewards vs. long time penalties, very few cut down on their consumption, despite begging and pleading by the mothers, wives and children, and despite dark predictions by their doctors. I strongly believe that addicts must take responsibility for their actions, but there's always that niggling knowledge that for a person who is physically/psychologically addicted to something, the choice to stop is that much harder.
And this is where I blame the people in charge - officials who issue liquor licenses, politicians who extol the revenue brought in by taxing alcohol and tobacco but who are too short sighted to see the costs of a diseased society. I blame policemen who consort with brewers of moonshine in exchange for bribes, and officials who exploit legal loopholes. It has been scientifically proven that increase in taxation and ban of advertising and ban of public consumption are effective measures in controlling tobacco and alcohol. And yet we have this. No perfumes or jewelery; no watches, electronic gadgets or chocolates. Just tobacco and alcohol, sold duty free... thithata matha.
I am no saint. Even though I have never spoken it out for a patient or relative to hear, I have often thought viciously to myself "yes, go ahead, drink all you want, just die at home instead of landing in the small hours of the morning and ruining my sleep" (remember in SL, we don't get the following day off after a rough night on-call). To deny those thoughts is to be dishonest and blind to my own failings.
In spite of all that, we should never lose sight of the fact that we are dealing with human beings. That denying healthcare to anyone - whatever their failings may be - is unethical, unacceptable and a betrayal of the compassion we all need to cultivate within ourselves.
It's hard to think charitable thoughts when an alcoholic is wheeled in as a "stat" admission, usually semi-conscious, vomiting blood, delirious and uncooperative. I confess I usually suppress a groan of despair at the sight of them... and with good reason. Almost invariably it results in a lot of running around, organising blood, plasma etc. etc. Especially at night where there is only one doctor and two nurses in a ward, this usually means that other patients might get neglected. Drugs and injections are not given on time, and other admissions are not seen to, because everyone is hovering around the alcoholic dude.
You see, the chronic alcoholics are LOUD. They are dramatic - swollen bellies, hallucinations, screams, blood and guts. They are critical - they may go into cardiac arrest at any time. And when (not if) they do, they are so obese, that it is near impossible for me to clamber on to their beds to deliver effective CPR. An additional thing I've noticed is that somehow, the relatives are the most demanding I've come across, the ones who are quick to make a fuss if things aren't done NOW.
And in the melee it is easy to miss the young dengue patient whose blood pressure has dropped, or the guy with the heart attack who has developed a rhythm disturbance of the heart, or the guy with leptospirosis whose urine output has dropped. When we do find out, it's because they too have progressed to a critical stage, when it could have been nipped in the bud. And that's not fair.
Then there is the expense. It's ironic that the patients with chronic lung disease due to smoking and chronic liver disease due to boozing cost the state more that the innocent johnny on the next bed who has done nothing to deserve his illness. Spiral CT scans, high resolution CT scans, ultra-sound scans, endoscopy, radiographically guided biopsies, inhalers, drugs, blood and blood products. Factor in the cost of hospital stay, meals, linen etc., which are also borne by the state. And then the health care sector runs through its allocated budget, and it is the other poor patients that bear the brunt of it. That's not fair.
You have to admit that the diseases are distressing, painful and associated with the hopelessness of knowing there is no cure. Yet because of the whole psychology behind short term rewards vs. long time penalties, very few cut down on their consumption, despite begging and pleading by the mothers, wives and children, and despite dark predictions by their doctors. I strongly believe that addicts must take responsibility for their actions, but there's always that niggling knowledge that for a person who is physically/psychologically addicted to something, the choice to stop is that much harder.
And this is where I blame the people in charge - officials who issue liquor licenses, politicians who extol the revenue brought in by taxing alcohol and tobacco but who are too short sighted to see the costs of a diseased society. I blame policemen who consort with brewers of moonshine in exchange for bribes, and officials who exploit legal loopholes. It has been scientifically proven that increase in taxation and ban of advertising and ban of public consumption are effective measures in controlling tobacco and alcohol. And yet we have this. No perfumes or jewelery; no watches, electronic gadgets or chocolates. Just tobacco and alcohol, sold duty free... thithata matha.
I am no saint. Even though I have never spoken it out for a patient or relative to hear, I have often thought viciously to myself "yes, go ahead, drink all you want, just die at home instead of landing in the small hours of the morning and ruining my sleep" (remember in SL, we don't get the following day off after a rough night on-call). To deny those thoughts is to be dishonest and blind to my own failings.
In spite of all that, we should never lose sight of the fact that we are dealing with human beings. That denying healthcare to anyone - whatever their failings may be - is unethical, unacceptable and a betrayal of the compassion we all need to cultivate within ourselves.
